Mass Immigration Is Their Final Solution

            Mass immigration, at least for some of its influential supporters, is an effective form of ethnic and political cleansing—a demographic “final solution” for their opponents. And it’s not just the case here in America, but throughout the Western world. In Great Britain recently, a top advisor to former Prime Minister Tony Blair and other leaders of the left-wing Labour Party, openly admitted the strategy of using immigration to take and hold power.

            According to that advisor, Andrew Neather, Labour leaders held “secret meetings” in 2000 where they agreed that “mass immigration into the country” was the best way to secure an unbeatable pro-Labour electorate. This would allow the party to “rub the right’s nose into diversity and render their arguments [against multiculturalism] out of date.” So much for native-born Britains who wanted their country to remain Britain.

            Here in America, our equivalent of Labour, the left-wing Democrats, appear to have a similar agenda. Though the evidence is not so strong as Neather’s admission, it is strong nevertheless. One item of it comes from the prominent Democratic strategist Robert Creamer, who wrote a book entitled How Progressives Can Win while serving a term in prison for fraud.

            In the book, Creamer advocates amnesty for illegal aliens and recruiting them and legal immigrants as Democratic voters. Said Creamer, “If Democrats continue to stand for immigrants’ rights, the issue will define immigrants’ loyalties for a generation. If we’re successful, a gigantic block of progressive [i.e., socialist] voters will enter the electorate over the next 15 years—a block that could be decisive in the battle for the future. . . .”

            As indicated by the health care battle, most Americans aren’t too keen on socialism. But their views won’t matter if Creamer and his ilk can round up enough votes from half-assimilated immigrants to swamp them.

Another bit of evidence comes from a speech given by Executive Vice President Eliseo Medina of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a pillar of support for the Democrats’ left-wing. Medina observed that amnesty and citizenship for illegal aliens would greatly aid “progressives.” Said Medina,“We would be creating a governing coalition for the long-term, not just for an election cycle.”

Still more evidence comes from Mexican diplomat Fredo Arias-King who served his country as a liaison to the U.S. Congress. He got to know many senators and House members and their views on immigration. He revealed that many Democrats see immigration as a means of acquiring a dependent and easily manipulated population to serve their goals. (Arias-King also encountered Republicans, with a similar low estimate of immigrants, who welcomed them as docile cheap labor.)

Supposedly the socialists and unscrupulous capitalists are enemies, but these days they often find common ground on immigration. Proud American citizens who value their freedom and standard of living are an obstacle to them both.      

Media propagandists, speaking for Democrat and Republican elites, tell average Americans that we must show “compassion” toward the unending flow of immigration—which is simply an attempt to manipulate our good nature to serve their evil objectives. If we fail to resist this manipulation, let us be forewarned. As we become marginalized and overwhelmed, we can be sure that the elites and their imported voters will have no compassion on us.